№ | Слайд | Текст |
1 |
 |
Dynamics of key indicators of national resources use efficiency: acomparative analysis Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation Anton Kosyanenko |
2 |
 |
Estimation of HDI based on Russian policy targetsEstimation of HDI under assumption that policy targets are successfully met Estimated HDI value based on policy targets in 2018 Actual HDI value in 2012 Successful attainment of policy targets would result in substantional increase of HDI and will Improve Russia rank from 55 to 31 Gross National Income Income Life Expectancy Education attainment Indicators of Human Development Index (HDI) Education Health Country HDI-2013 Value Rank Brunei 0,855 30 Russia-2018 0,853 31 Cyprus 0,848 31 Malta 0,847 32 Andorra 0,846 33 Estonia 0,846 34 Slovak Republic 0,840 35 Qatar 0,834 36 Hungary 0,831 37 Barbados 0,825 38 Poland 0,821 39 Chile 0,819 40 Lithuania 0,818 41 United Arab Emirates 0,818 42 Portugal 0,816 43 Latvia 0,814 44 Argentina 0,811 45 Seychelles 0,806 46 Croatia 0,805 47 Bahrain 0,796 48 Bahamas 0,794 49 Belorussia 0,793 50 Uruguay 0,792 51 Montenegro 0,791 52 Palau 0,791 53 Kuwait 0,790 54 Russia 0,788 55 Romania 0,786 56 Values provided within Forecast-2030 Policy target in President of Russian Federation Decree №598 Estimation based on Rosstat data |
3 |
 |
Semantic analysis and terms interconnections patterns |
4 |
 |
Comparison of development indicators groups used in Russian andinternational indicators sets Groups of key national indicators in decrees of President of Russian Federation and Government of Russian Federation Economy Households income Employment and jobs Health and Demography Education Housing Housing services and utilities Friendly and Safe Environment |
5 |
 |
Interrelations of inputs, outputs and outcomes in domain estimatesRecommended scope of indicators according to Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Comission report Not included into recommended scope of indicators by Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Comission |
6 |
 |
Data availability for Наличие данных необходимых для оценки ключевыхпоказателей СЭР Enough data available for comprehensive analysis of indicators dynamics Economy Housholds income Employment and Jobs Health and demography Education Housing Friendly and safe environment Numerical values of outcome indicators as policy targets Planned amounts of national resources use Утвержденные государственные программы (по состоянию на 1 марта 2013 года) Statistics needed for comprehensive international comparisons Time series of subjective indicators Groups of key national indicators in decrees of President of Russian Federation and Government of Russian Federation |
7 |
 |
Importance of progress metrics choiceCardiovascular mortality (data by Rosstat) 2009 год 2010 год Nominal sex-age structure Standardized sex-age structure (WHO European standard) 801,0 423,5 806,4 421,2 Mortality increased Mortality decreased |
8 |
 |
Outcomes indicators interrelations |
9 |
 |
Dynamics of objective and subjective indicators of outcomesInfant mortality 2020 Life expectancy |
10 |
 |
National resources used by source (public and private healthcareexpenditure) United States Japan Poland Russia China |
11 |
 |
Outcomes and national resources usedLife expectancy at birth, years Total health expenditure per capita, 2005 PPP US Dollars Japan United States Poland China Russia |
12 |
 |
Outcomes and national resources usedLife expectancy at birth, years Total health expenditure per capita, 2005 PPP US Dollars |
13 |
 |
Policy targets attainability assessmentCompared to global average dynamics of indicators policy targets set for Russian Federation are planned to be achieved with use of 1,75 times less resources with 2 times shorter time horizon Total health expenditure per capita, 2005 PPP US Dollars Life expectancy at birth, years |
14 |
 |
Thank youAccounts Chamber of the Russian Federation Anton Kosyanenko kosyanenko@ach.gov.ru a.v.kosyanenko@gmail.com |
«Dynamics of key indicators of national resources use efficiency: a comparative analysis» |
http://900igr.net/prezentacija/anglijskij-jazyk/dynamics-of-key-indicators-of-national-resources-use-efficiency-a-comparative-analysis-226503.html