№ | Слайд | Текст |
1 |
 |
New ALICE Beam Pipe: Injection ProtectionC. Bracco on Behalf of ABT/BTP Acknowledgment: M. Giovannozzi |
2 |
 |
OutlinesReminder Assumptions Aperture and beam envelope: Nominal injection Grazing event (MKI failure) Conclusions |
3 |
 |
Reminder |
4 |
 |
To protect the LHC aperture at injection (bottleneck in the arc) andrespect the collimation hierarchy: LHC injection protection collimators (TDI, TCLIA and TCLIB) ar at 6.8 s TCDI (in the TL) are at 4.5 – 5 s Reminder |
5 |
 |
Alice aperture: results - IOk!...check MKI grazing failure.. M. Giovannozzi b*=10 m qext=170 mrad Sep=2 mm Minimum aperture = 13 s (bottleneck in the arc) 4 s bottleneck in the experiment 18/07/2014 MG - TREX meeting 5 |
6 |
 |
Reminder90% MKI strength 10% MKI strength |
7 |
 |
AssumptionsOnly MKI failures are considered :Only vertical plane Normalised emittance of 3.5 mm mrad also for postLS2 case Optics for protons (minimum n1):b* = 10 m, crossing angle = 170 mrad , separation =2 mm Beam envelope: 6.8 sb (what can go through TCDIs and TDI) Aperture: Mech.aperture* – Mech.tol.* – Orbit** – Disp.offset * Data from ALICE and Massimo ** 3 mm *sqrt(b/max(b)) ** Dy*3e-4 |
8 |
 |
Aperture and Beam Envelope PreLS2Nominal kick TDI TDI |
9 |
 |
Aperture and Beam Envelope PostLS2Nominal kick TDI TDI |
10 |
 |
Phase Advance MinAperture- MKI |
11 |
 |
Grazing Eventgrazing (10% MKI kick) TDI Nominal MKI kick TDI |
12 |
 |
ConclusionsThe new proposed aperture fulfills the n1 requirements of collimation hierarchy: bottleneck kept in the arc and > 7.5 s No direct beam impact on the new aperture is expected also in case of the most critical MKI failure (grazing event) Recommendation: calculate energy deposition induced by secondary showers in case of grazing event. |
«New ALICE Beam Pipe: Injection Protection» |
http://900igr.net/prezentacija/anglijskij-jazyk/new-alice-beam-pipe-injection-protection-230096.html