№ | Слайд | Текст |
1 |
 |
SAP SD Performance Tuning - Xbox and the Need for Speed -Christoph Schuler, Cindi McCutchen SAP Application Support Microsoft Corporation |
2 |
 |
AgendaSAP at Microsoft – Quick Facts Why Performance Tuning SAP Service Offerings Project Approach & Best Practices Tuning for Xbox Changes Implemented Summary of Results Lessons Learned |
3 |
 |
SAP at Microsoft Quick FactsModules implemented: SD, MM, FI, CO, AM, HR, BW, APO 875 GB in a single, central Database; 6 GB/wk growth 2,000 named users; 50,000+ total users > 600 concurrent users; heavy EDI usage 0.5 - 2 sec response time globally (incl. WAN connectivity) 99.9+% availability Platform: SQL Server 2000, Windows .NET server |
4 |
 |
Why Performance Tuning Business need for data throughput Xbox Launch North America, Nov. ’01: Peak volumes Existing Xbox Change Sales orders / day ~ 5,000 + 7,600 + 152 % Deliveries / day ~ 5,000 + 11,400 + 228 % Sales orders / hour * ~ 250 + 2,500 + 1,000 % Deliveries / hour * ~ 1,000 + 2,500 + 250 % * Each order & delivery with 10 line items |
5 |
 |
Why Performance Tuning System availability & supportability Prevention of: Cross-module increase in response time Business disruptions Penalties End user frustration Increased support costs System scalability Ability to handle future growth |
6 |
 |
SAP Service OfferingsFocus on critical SD business processes 50+ recommendations to improve performance Technical Solution Optimization (TSO) Now: Solutions Management Optimization (SMO) Interface Management Business Process Optimization Data Mgmt. & Archiving Oct ‘00: FI Archiving Sep ‘00: Sales Orders Backorder Resch. Deliveries Billing Jun ‘00: EDI Interface GBI Interface |
7 |
 |
Project ApproachProject team Functional Basis/Technical Development Stress Test Consulting (BUIT & SAP) Project timeline Driven by business need Repetitive cycle One item at a time Project metrics e.g. seconds/document |
8 |
 |
Test Best PracticesHave an original baseline test Automate tests and standardize your data & configuration Include anticipated new functionality (e.g. routing, allocations) Consider systems external to SAP Make test as realistic as possible ! |
9 |
 |
Analysis Best PracticesDefine your metrics (e.g. sec/doc, response time, etc..) Carefully document results and improvements with each cycle Review results and plan for next changes to be implemented and tested |
10 |
 |
Analysis Useful Tools & TransactionsSystemwide work process overview – SM66 Workload monitor – ST03 SQL trace - ST05 SQL trace interpreter - SQLR Application analysis – ST14 Table access statistics – ST10 Memory configuration monitor – ST02 R/3 OS monitor – ST06 IDoc monitor – WE05 Gateway Monitor - SMGW Windows PerfMon – CPU utilization |
11 |
 |
Analysis Process Overview - SM66Quick overview of all work processes Look for: Long-running processes “Stopped” processes Highly utilized servers Processes accessing the same tables |
12 |
 |
Analysis Database Trace - ST05Important tool to analyze database performance problems Look for: Most “expensive” database accesses (Trace Summary) Repetitive database accesses |
13 |
 |
Change Best PracticesChanges may include: OSS notes (> 2,600 performance notes for 4.5B) ABAP code optimization Configuration Technical settings Hardware Business process or logic Carefully document changes made Analysis Change |
14 |
 |
AgendaWhy Performance Tuning SAP Service Offerings Project Approach & Best Practices Tuning for Xbox Changes Implemented Summary of Results Lessons Learned |
15 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox1 Retailer Microsoft (SAP System) Distribution Warehouse Sales Order Sales Order (EDI 850) |
16 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox 1 – Sales Order ProcessingSwitch to parallel processing of inbound IDocs Partner profile change: ’Immediate’ to ‘Background’ (via WE20) Server group configuration with resource parameters (via RZ12) –OSS 384971 Schedule program RBDAPP01 Specify packet size and ‘Parallel’ posting option Deactivate IDoc syntax check Increase of program buffer |
17 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox 1 – Sales Order ProcessingSD number range buffering Table NRIV - Object RV_BELEG (via SNRO) Local buffering by work process ID Exclusion of sales orgs (OSS note 424486) ABAP code improvements VA01 user exits Elimination of repetitive table reads Table buffering Monitor access statistics (via ST10) |
18 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox1 2 Retailer Microsoft (SAP System) Distribution Warehouse Sales Order Sales Order (EDI 850) Rescheduling |
19 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox 2 - Backorder ReschedulingCleanup of old orders Program SDV03V02 by plant – daily Evaluation of program SDV03V01 Modification (repair) of SDV03V02 Due to SD number buffering Take order creation date & time into account Custom pre-processing program Dynamic job builder and distribute workload over several processes Utilize standard SAP programs |
20 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox1 2 3 Retailer Microsoft (SAP System) Distribution Warehouse Sales Order Delivery Sales Order (EDI 850) Rescheduling Ship Order (EDI 940) |
21 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox 3 – Delivery (EDI Ship Order)Custom pre-processing program: Dynamic job builder and distribute workload over several processes Utilize standard SAP program (RV50SBT1) Additional index on table VBBE Separation of output from document creation Schedule RSNAST00 to process output Schedule RSEOUT00 to process IDocs and combine into files |
22 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox 3 – Delivery (EDI Ship Order)Deactivate IDoc Syntax Check SD number range buffering Activate shared locking For availability checking group level for ATP (via OVZ2) Evaluate program RVV50R1T (VL10) instead of current DDL Program was evaluated but not implemented Server group functionality is available in SAP version 4.6c |
23 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox1 2 5 3 4 Retailer Microsoft (SAP System) Distribution Warehouse Sales Order Goods Issue Delivery Sales Order (EDI 850) Rescheduling Ship Order (EDI 940) Ship Confirm (EDI 945) Shipment |
24 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox 5 – Post Goods Issue (EDI Ship Confirm)Switch to parallel processing of inbound IDocs via RBDAPP01 Same as sales order processing Table Locking – MVER (OSS Note 318581) Prevent plant locking Allow IDOC to be reprocessed (from a status 64) instead of going into an error (status 51) Activate ‘Late exclusive enqueue’ For material movements via OMJI (OSS 192423) Deactivate IDoc syntax check |
25 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox6 1 2 5 3 4 Retailer Microsoft (SAP System) Distribution Warehouse Sales Order Goods Issue Delivery Billing Invoice (EDI 810) Sales Order (EDI 850) Rescheduling Ship Order (EDI 940) Ship Confirm (EDI 945) Shipment |
26 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox 6- BillingSD number range buffering Exclude certain countries due to legal requirements (OSS Note 23835, 363901) Parallel processing of billing due list Program RV60SBAT, specify ‘Number of jobs’ Separation of output from document creation Schedule RSNAST00 to process output Schedule RSEOUT00 to process IDocs |
27 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox Additional Changes ImplementedATP server (Available to Promise) Information in OSS note 99999 Installed on central instance Tax solution (Vertex) upgrade Use ‘Registered RFC mode’ (OSS 63930) APO RFC calls (Advanced Planning Optimizer) RFC queue in R/3 spawning ARFC* jobs |
28 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox Summary of Testing ResultsSD Core Transactions: |
29 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox Summary of ResultsXbox Transaction Volume Xbox Transaction Performance |
30 |
 |
Tuning for Xbox Summary of Lessons LearnedUtilize SAP/OSS resources Assemble a project team with a wide range of knowledge Only test ONE change at a time Be prepared to spend about 80% of your time testing And learn to hide from the Basis team ? |
31 |
 |
References“SAP R/3 Performance Optimization” by Thomas Schneider, Sybex “ALE, EDI & IDoc Technologies for SAP” by Arvind Nagpal, Prima Tech |
32 |
 |
Questions |
33 |
 |
Cindi McCutchen & Christoph Schuler Microsoft Corporation Email:cynmc@microsoft.com or christos@microsoft.com |
«SAP SD Performance Tuning - Xbox and the Need for Speed -» |
http://900igr.net/prezentacija/anglijskij-jazyk/sap-sd-performance-tuning-xbox-and-the-need-for-speed-188557.html